This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
JISRP
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Case Studies
    • Commentary
    • Conference Abstracts
    • Conference Presentation
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Research Articles
    • Review
    • Society info
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • search
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:10380/feed
ISSN 0892-6298
Research Articles
Vol. 16, Issue 1-4, 1998December 31, 1998 CDT

Evaluation of the Bitrex™ Qualitative Fit Test Method Using N95 Filtering-Facepiece Respirators

Christopher C. Coffey, Ziqing Zhuang, Donald L. Campbell,
Copyright Logoccby-4.0 • https://doi.org/10.66828/001c.168226

Articles in Vol. 16, Issue 1-4, 1998

Vol. 16, Issue 1-4, 1998
  • Decline in Protection Efficiency in the Use of Dust Respirators
    Kikuzi Kimura
  • Minimum Passing Fit Factor
    Ching-tsen Bien
  • Quantitative Fit-Testing of N95 Respirators: Part I—Method Development
    Ziqing ZhuangC.C. CoffeyW.R. MyersJ. YangD.L. Campbell
  • Quantitative Fit-Testing of N95 Respirators: Part II—Results, Effect of Filter Penetration, Fit-Test, and Pass/Fail Criteria on Respirator Performance
    C. C. CoffeyZ. ZhuangD. L. CampbellW. R. Myers
  • Comparison of Two Newly Developed Methods for Fit Testing N95 Respirators
    Ziqing ZhuangChristopher C. CoffeyDonald L. CampbellWarren R. Myers
  • Evaluation of the Bitrex™ Qualitative Fit Test Method Using N95 Filtering-Facepiece Respirators
    Christopher C. CoffeyZiqing ZhuangDonald L. Campbell
JISRP
Coffey, C. C., Zhuang, Z., & Campbell, D. L. (1998). Evaluation of the BitrexTM Qualitative Fit Test Method Using N95 Filtering-Facepiece Respirators. Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection, 16(1–4), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.66828/001c.168226
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system